Take it to em Mitt
Romney hammered Horseface Kerry in the Boston Globe this morning.
"I think it shows a complete lack of understanding of the kind of enemy that we're facing," said Romney, a Republican. "This is not a small group of wackos in the hills that all we have to do is go find one person and it suddenly goes away."
In turn, Kerry's communications director, David Wade, questioned the governor's knowledge of issues related to Iraq and terrorism.
"Mitt Romney's command of national security is about as real as the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," Wade said.
We at the Cooler are happy with Mitt for not taking any sh** from Horseface. Maybe John Kerry had devised a coherent national security message 2 years ago, his Communications Director wouldn't be making cheeky comments to the Boston Globe for a lame-duck wannabe President right now.
"I think it shows a complete lack of understanding of the kind of enemy that we're facing," said Romney, a Republican. "This is not a small group of wackos in the hills that all we have to do is go find one person and it suddenly goes away."
In turn, Kerry's communications director, David Wade, questioned the governor's knowledge of issues related to Iraq and terrorism.
"Mitt Romney's command of national security is about as real as the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," Wade said.
We at the Cooler are happy with Mitt for not taking any sh** from Horseface. Maybe John Kerry had devised a coherent national security message 2 years ago, his Communications Director wouldn't be making cheeky comments to the Boston Globe for a lame-duck wannabe President right now.
posted by Caucus Cooler at 8/12/2006
4 Comments:
When does Mitt even have time to govern?
We need to focus on the Democrats historic weakness. These people, especially the two limosine liberal Lord Haw Haws that represent Massachusetts in the United States Senate, were wrong on Vietnam, it lead to genocide. They fought Reagan every step of the way, always wrong. They gutted the armed forces and national intellegence capability when in power in the 90's. They appeased global terror every year of the Clinton Administration. (Hey, Maddy Albirght-how'd that deal work with North Korea?) They have resisted every tool of national power that lead to the this week's terror arrests. Why would anyone give them any credibility on issues of national security?
John Edwards is leading the next generation of failed weak obstructionest liberal policy Ted. He's been making ridiculous comments on the WOT since he's been in town.
Romney weak on security?
I don't think so!
Romney's got Homeland Security nailed
Sporer rocks! Great job with the proper discrediting of Kerry (and Kennedy) on national security. Although they've surely heard more than Romney, he has no ability to turn that knowledge into appropriate policy.
Post a Comment
<< Home